Bill has gone through two intermediate level chemo treatments, and today he met his permanent oncologist (his initial doctor was just "on loan"). Expecting to begin episode three, we heard instead some detailed information about remission statistics. Apparently, a more aggressive regime would probably deliver a far greater chance of a longer remission period (5-7 years vs 1-3).
The downside to going with the more aggressive treatment is the increased side effects. Bill would really feel this one. The trade-off? Most likely a much longer remission. The doctor has advised Bill to go the aggressive route because of Bill's strong physical activity level and his relatively young age.
It is so hard to go in a new direction after commiting to the first one, but Bill has a week to think about all the angles before making a final commitment.
Hard decision to have to make. In my prayers!
ReplyDelete